RIO 2016 GAMES'S SCHEDULE: TERMS AND TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/rpp.v16i3.19270

Keywords:

Public policy, Public Agenda, Sports, Olympics

Abstract

The training schedule comprises a turning point in public policy formulation, defining objects of government intervention. In this sense, we analyzed the terms and themes that go through the scheduling of 2016 Games. The research was based on documentary survey constructed from institutional sources and printed media, discussed with technical support in the content analysis. Allowed to map the interests which permeated Rio bid to host the Olympics, to identify trends in Brazilian sports policy and discuss the public-private relationship in the context of organizing the Games, as well as identifying challenges for the research agenda on sports mega-events.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Pedro Athayde, University of Brasília
    Doutorando em Política Social da Universidade de Brasília.
  • Fernando Mascarenhas, University of Brasília
    Professor Doutor da Universidade de Brasília.
  • Wagner Barbosa Matias, University of Brasília
    Mestrando em Educação Física da Universidade de Brasília.
  • Natália Nascimento Miranda, University of Brasília
    Acadêmica de Educação Física e Bolsista de Iniciação Científica da Universidade de Brasília.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-30

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 3 (2013)

Section

Artigos Originais

License

This publication is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License

Creative Commons License

How to Cite

ATHAYDE, P. et al. RIO 2016 GAMES’S SCHEDULE: TERMS AND TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION. Pensar a Prática, v. 16, n. 3, 30 Sep.2013.