Fermentative characteristics and bromatological composition of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) silage at different silo opening times
Abstract
Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) shows potential as a forage alternative for the Brazilian semiarid region due to its hardiness and high crude protein content. However, its ensiling process faces challenges related to its high buffering capacity, which compromises fermentative efficiency. This study evaluated the fermentative profile and bromatological composition of pigeon pea silage at different silo opening times. Fermentative parameters (pH, ammoniacal nitrogen/N-NH3) and bromatological components (dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber – NDF, acid detergent fiber – ADF, hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin) were analyzed. The results indicated stability in NDF, ADF, and cellulose contents over time, with significant variation in lignin, associated with the degradation of soluble fractions and oxidative processes. The fermentative profile revealed relatively high pH values and accumulation of N-NH3, reflecting intense proteolysis and low efficiency of lactic fermentation. It is concluded that pigeon pea silage, although presenting relevant protein value, shows fermentative and nutritional limitations, especially due to the accumulation of non-protein nitrogen compounds and lignin content, factors that reduce fiber digestibility. These results reinforce the need for management strategies, such as the use of additives or associations with grasses, to optimize the fermentative process and expand the use of pigeon pea as conserved forage in semiarid regions.
Keywords: Cajanus cajan; bromatological composition; fermentation; semiarid; silage.
Downloads
References
1. Ferreira MA, Silva FM, Bispo SV, Azevedo M. Estratégias na suplementação de vacas leiteiras no semiárido. Rev Bras Zootec. 2009;38(supl. esp.):322-329. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001300032
2. Santos ARM, Silva AF, Moura RMP, Lima AEP, Nascimento RS. Valor nutritivo de plantas forrageiras cultivadas no semiárido brasileiro: uma revisão. Rev Bras Geogr Fís. 2023;16(3):1125-1139. Available from: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/rbgfe/article/view/257335
3. Voltolini TV, Neves ALA, Santos MFV. Alternativas alimentares e sistemas de produção animal para o semiárido brasileiro. Petrolina: Embrapa Semiárido; 2010. 35 p. (Embrapa Semiárido. Documentos; 239). Available from: https://www.embrapa.br/en/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/861978/alternativas-alimentares-e-sistemas-de-producao-animal-para-o-semiarido-brasileiro
4. Santana JCS, Morais JAS, Santos MSAS, Gurgel ALC, Muniz EN, Oliveira VS. Características fermentativas, composição química e fracionamento da proteína da silagem de gliricídia submetida a diferentes períodos de fermentação. Bol Ind Anim. 2019;76:1-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17523/. 12 dez. 2024
5. Haji A, Teka TA, Bereka TY, Andersa KN, Nekera KD, Abdi GG, et al. Nutritional Composition, Bioactive Compounds, Food Applications, and Health Benefits of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.): A Review. Cienc Legum. 2024;6(2):1-15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13837
6. Dantas SM, Souza SM, Silva PSL, Silva RHC, Silva JFS, Silva LFS. Análise bromatológica do feijão guandu cultivado em sequeiro para produção de forragens. BIOENG. 2021;15(3):381-390. Available from: https://seer.tupa.unesp.br/BIOENG/article/download/938/525/3955
7. Guedes FL, Pompeu RCFF, Souza HA, Rogério MCP. Guandu para produção de forragem e de grãos no Semiárido cearense. Sobral: Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos; 2019. 14 p. Available from: https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1117099/guandu-para-producao-de-forragem-e-de-graos-no-semiarido-cearense
8. Borreani G, Tabaco E, Schmidt RJ, Holmes BJ, Muck RE. Revisão de silagem: Fatores que afetam a matéria seca e as perdas de qualidade em silagens. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(5):3952-3979. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13837
9. Muck RE. Microbiologia da silagem e seu controle por meio de aditivos. Rev Bras Zootec. 2010;39:183-191. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010001300021
10. Kung JR L, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(5):4020-4033. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909
11. Alves WS. Características fermentativas de silagens de gramíneas tropicais tratadas ou não com enzimas fibrolíticas [thesis]. Viçosa (MG): Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 2024. Available from: https://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/33124
12. Brito GSM. Características fermentativas e nutricionais de silagens compostas por Palma forrageira e Gliricídia [master's thesis]. Universidade Federal da Paraíba; 2018. Available from: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/16609
13. Köppen W, Geiger R. Klimate der Erde. Gotha: Verlag Justus Perthes; 1928. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2134755&utm_source
14. Fundação Cearense de Meteorologia e Recursos Hídricos – FUNCEME. Dados climáticos de Fortaleza. Fortaleza; 2019. Available from: https://www.funceme.br.
15. Detmann E, Souza MA, Valadares Filho SC, Queiroz AC, Berchielli TT, Saliba EOS, et al. Métodos para análise de alimentos. 1ª ed. Visconde do Rio Branco: Suprema; 2012. 214 p. Available from: https://livraria.funep.org.br/product/metodo-para-analise-de-alimentos/
16. Bolsen KK, Lin C, Brent B, Feyerherm AM, Urban JE, Aimutis WR. Effect of Silage Additives on the Microbial Succession and Fermentation Process of Alfalfa and Corn Silages. J Dairy Sci. 1992;75(11):3066-3083. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78070-9
17. Vieira PF. Efeito do formaldeído na proteção de proteínas e lipídios em rações para ruminantes [thesis]. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 1980. 98 p. Available from: https://locus.ufv.br/items/32ffaac0-129f-4259-a863-0b2eb7751225
18. Silva DJ, Queiroz AC. Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos. 3ª ed. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 2002. 235 p. Available from: https://www.editoraufv.com.br
19. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74(10):3583-3597. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
20. Arcanjo AHM, Soares NA, Oliveira AR, Pereira KA, Anésio AHC. Silagem de leguminosas: revisão de literatura. Nutri Time. 2016;13(3):1-15. Available from: www.nutritime.com.br
21. Zambom MA, Fernandes T, Soares MSSP, Castagnara DD, Neres MA, Javorski CR, et al. Características da silagem de resíduo úmido de fécula de mandioca adicionada de níveis de ureia. Arch Zootec. 2014;63(244):677-688. Available from: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?pid=S0004-05922014000400011&script=sci_arttext
22. Pahlow G, Muck RE, Driehuis F, Oude Elferink SJWH, Spoelstra SF. Microbiologia da ensilagem. In: Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH, editors. Ciência e tecnologia da silagem. Madison: American Society of Agronomy; 2003. p. 31-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr42.c2
23. Wilkinson JM, Davies DR. The aerobic stability of silage: key findings and recent developments. Grass Forage Sci. 2013;68(1):1-19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00891.x
24. Weinberg ZG, Muck RE. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1996;19(1):53-68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-6445(96)00025-3
25. Wei H, Tian P, Zheng M, Wang H, Xu C. Characteristics of proteolytic microorganisms and their effects on proteolysis in total mixed ration silages of soybean curd residue. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020;33(1):100-110. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6946985/
26. Xin Y, Chen C, Zhong Y, Bu X, Huang S, Tahir M, et al. Effect of storage time on the silage quality and microbial community of mixed maize and faba bean in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1090401. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1090401
27. Anjos VFL. Microbiologia e perdas fermentativas de silagem de planta inteira reidratada colhida em maturidade avançada [master's thesis]. Piracicaba: Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo; 2023. Available from: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-05062023-152311/pt-br.php
28. Muck RE, Nadeau EMG, Mcallister TA, Contreras-Govea FE, Santos MC, Kung JR L. Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(5):3980-4000. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13839
29. Luttero PAL, Leal ES, Silva PLA. Avaliação da qualidade bromatológica de silagens de feijão guandu em diferentes sistemas de cultivo [undergraduate thesis]. Rio Verde: Instituto Federal Goiano; 2023. 45 p. Available from: https://repositorio.ifgoiano.edu.br/bitstream/prefix/4220/1/tcc_Pedro%20Luttero%20Antonio%20Leal%20e%20Silva.pdf
30. Melo BMG, Lana RP. Silagem de dieta total com feijão guandu destinadas a vacas leiteiras. Rev Bras Agropec Sustentável. 2024;14(1):56-67. Available from: https://periodicos.ufv.br/rbas/article/download/19572/9938/87496
31. Coelho MAO, Araújo EC. Qualidade de silagem de trigo em função do tempo de fermentação. Cerrado Agrociências. 2018;12(4):393-399. Available from: https://revistas.unipam.edu.br/index.php/cerradoagrociencias/article/view/4084
32. Xu L, Liu Y, Zhang X, Zhang H. Effects of sowing methods on nitrogen compounds and protease activities of whole-crop wheat silage. Grassland Res. 2023;3(1):e12041. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/glr2.12041
33. Van Soest PJ. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2ª ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1994. Available from: https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801427725/nutritional-ecology-of-the-ruminant/
34. Detmann E, Silva LFC, Rocha GC, Palma MNN, Rodrigues JPP. Métodos para análise de alimentos. 2ª ed. Visconde do Rio Branco (MG): Suprema; 2021. Available from: https://livraria.funep.org.br/product/metodos-para-analise-de-alimentos-2-edicao/
35. Diepersloot EC, Oba M, Araujo PHH, Coors JG. Effect of cutting height, microbial inoculation, and storage length on fermentation profile and nutrient composition of whole-plant corn silage. Transl Anim Sci. 2022;6(2):txac037. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/tas/article/6/2/txac037/6556073
36. Cao X, Zhang L, Li J, Wang Q, Zhou X, Liu C, et al. Enhanced lignin degradation by Irpex lacteus through expanded sterilization further improved the fermentation quality and microbial community during the silage preservation process. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2024;11:14.. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-024-00730-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Data statement
-
The research data is available on demand, condition justified in the manuscript























